Call us: 503-255-8795

Category: Personal Injury

What Questions to Ask After a Car Wreck in Oregon?

What Questions to Ask After a Car Wreck in Oregon?

Written by George McCoy on . Posted in Car Accident, Personal Injury.

Being involved in a car accident, even a minor one, can be disorienting. One of the best things you can do to prepare just in case is to know what information you might need to gather to help protect your rights.

For instance, whenever possible, take pictures of vehicle damage (from several vantage points), license plates, driver’s licenses and insurance cards, any visible injuries, and the scene of the accident itself (including weather conditions, skid marks, traffic signals or signs, other vehicles, debris, etc.). Also, write down as much information as you can, especially about road conditions, weather, or other contributing factors, as soon as possible while your memory is fresh.

The personal injury attorneys at Warren Allen LLP have worked with many clients throughout the Pacific Northwest and have put together helpful guidance on the questions you should ask after a car wreck in Oregon, in addition to documenting the scene, to be ready for potential legal or insurance claims.

Questions to Ask Immediately

Although it can be difficult to think clearly after a car accident, it’s important to try to stay calm. The most important immediate consideration is the safety of everyone involved. Useful questions could include:

  • Is anyone hurt? If so, call 911 for an ambulance.
  • Are we in a safe spot? If there are no injuries and the vehicles are operable, move them to the shoulder of the road or to a safe location near the scene of the accident, such as a parking lot, to make room for other motorists and emergency response vehicles. Oregon law actually requires drivers to remove vehicles from the roadway after an accident in these situations.
  • Can other drivers see us? If there are injuries or you are not able to move your car, do your best to make sure other drivers can see that your vehicle is disabled to prevent secondary collisions. Turn on your hazard lights and use roadside flares or warning triangles if you have them.
  • Once everyone is as safe as possible, the next question to ask is, Do I need to report the accident to the police? In the case of a car wreck in Oregon, drivers are required to inform law enforcement if the accident results in death or injury, more than $2,500 in damages (to vehicles or property), or a vehicle being towed from the scene along with damage over $2,500. Remember that you will need to file a Collision and Insurance report with the DMV within 72 hours of the accident if it meets the above criteria.

Questions for Law Enforcement

When police arrive at the scene, it can be helpful to ask certain questions to make sure you have the necessary information should you need to pursue a legal or insurance claim later. Ask for the responding officer’s name and badge number and which law enforcement agency they are affiliated with. You can also ask for the case number (sometimes also referred to as an incident number), how you can access a copy of the police report, and if the officer is issuing any charges or citations.

Questions for Others Involved

No matter who is at fault in the accident, it’s important to exchange information with the other driver or drivers. Ask for full names and contact information. If possible, you should also ask to see their insurance card and take a picture of it so that you have a record of their insurance company, a policy number, and a phone number. Do they own the car, or if not, who is the owner? Make note of the make, model, color, and license plate number of each vehicle involved. Take down the names of any passengers involved as well.

As you gather information from the other drivers, be careful not to admit fault. Avoid apologizing, since an apology could be interpreted as accepting blame for the accident.

Questions for Witnesses

If other drivers or pedestrians witnessed the accident and have stayed at the scene, you can ask questions to get witness statements. Getting information from witnesses is best done as soon as possible since memories tend to fade or change with time. Basic questions for witnesses could include:

  • Can I have your name and contact information?
  • What did you see or hear?
  • Were you driving, stopped, parked, or standing nearby? Where?
  • Are you willing to give a witness statement to law enforcement or to an insurance adjuster?

Questions for Your Insurance Company

Although it’s a good idea to be familiar with your insurance policy before you ever need it, you should speak with your insurance agent as soon as possible after a car wreck in Oregon. Be sure to talk with your own insurance company before you give any statements to the insurance company of the other driver. Ask about your policy’s coverage and limits. Oregon has specific car insurance requirements, but it’s possible that you have additional coverage as well.

Can your insurance company help with car repairs or a rental vehicle? Do they require a detailed statement? How much time do you have to file a claim? Will your premiums increase if you file a claim? What documentation do you need to provide?

Questions for a Personal Injury Lawyer

In certain cases, you might need to consult with a personal injury lawyer. For instance, if you or someone in your vehicle is injured in the accident, if fault is being disputed, if the other driver’s insurance company or attorney contacts you, or if you feel like you are being pressured to admit fault or accept a settlement that is less than reasonable.

When looking for a reputable personal injury lawyer, ask about their experience with cases similar to yours and if they specialize in personal injury. You can ask about their success rate and if they have trial and court experience. They should also provide you with clear information about their fees and pricing structure. Many personal injury lawyers work on a contingency basis where they do not get paid unless you win your case. If you have been in a car wreck in Oregon, the personal injury team at Warren Allen LLP would be happy to discuss your case and your options with you. You don’t have to face this challenging time alone. Let our team be your team. Schedule a consultation today!

What Types of Cases Do Personal Injury Attorneys in Oregon Handle?

What Types of Cases Do Personal Injury Attorneys in Oregon Handle?

Written by George McCoy on . Posted in Personal Injury.

Personal injury attorneys in Oregon, as in other states, work to protect the rights of victims of negligence, accidents, or intentional misconduct of many different kinds. From negotiating with insurance companies to compiling and evaluating evidence to representing you in court, personal injury attorneys provide support as you seek justice and financial compensation to assist in your recovery. A fair settlement can help you with medical expenses, lost wages, repairs, and pain and suffering.

If you’re wondering if your situation falls under the umbrella of a personal injury case, the following descriptions outline the types of cases that personal injury attorneys in Oregon, like the experienced team at Warren Allen LLP, handle for their clients.

Car and Other Vehicular Accidents

Unfortunately, accidents involving cars, trucks, motorcycles, and bicycles are common no matter where you live. Collisions often occur due to road or weather conditions, inexperience, disobeying traffic rules, distracted driving, reckless driving or speeding, or driving while under the influence or fatigued.

For Oregon drivers, determining fault in an accident is important because the person at fault can be held responsible for damages or injuries, including emotional distress. Personal injury attorneys are experienced in navigating the insurance claims process and might be able to negotiate a fair settlement for you with the other driver’s insurance company.

If you do need to pursue legal action in court, your personal injury lawyer will obtain evidence to support your case. This might include police and eyewitness reports, surveillance footage, photos, and other evidence from the scene. They can also work with medical and other experts, such as accident reconstruction experts, to bolster your case. Your lawyer will represent you in court if the case is not settled beforehand.

Medical Malpractice

Medicine is not an exact science, but we trust that our medical health professionals will use their expertise to accurately diagnose and treat our health issues, sicknesses, and injuries to the best of their ability. However, there might come a time when you experience significant harm (either physical and emotional) due to substandard medical care or a healthcare provider’s negligence.

Known as medical malpractice, these personal injury cases usually involve a missed diagnosis, an incorrect diagnosis, surgical errors, birth injuries, or mistakes with medication prescriptions. Consulting with a personal injury lawyer in cases of medical malpractice is essential because these types of cases are usually complex and require expert medical testimony and detailed evidence that might be difficult to put together on your own. They can work with medical experts to assess the standard of care, identify any breaches of that standard, determine liability, and file the appropriate claims on your behalf.

Slip and Fall (or Premises Liability)

Slip-and-fall accidents, where you sustain an injury from slipping, tripping, or falling, can happen at a business, but they can also occur if you fall on someone’s private property. Property and business owners have a moral and legal obligation to maintain safe conditions on their premises and to appropriately warn visitors of known hazards. For instance, when an employee mops up a spill and the floor is wet, the business should place a sign to alert customers until the floor is dry.

If you experience a slip-and-fall accident due to negligence, you might be entitled to some financial compensation from the property owner or the person responsible for the property at the time of your injury.

Common causes of slip-and-fall accidents include:

  • Icy sidewalks
  • Wet floors
  • Uneven surfaces
  • Poorly maintained stairs or floor
  • Inadequate lighting

Personal injury attorneys in Oregon understand the ins and outs of Oregon premises liability requirements. They can work toward establishing the property owner’s negligence legally by demonstrating how the property owner should have known about the hazard, did not ensure safe conditions, or did not use signage or appropriate notification to warn visitors. Your personal injury attorney will also gather evidence and documentation, including police or incident reports, photographs of the scene, eyewitness accounts, and medical records, to strengthen your case.

Workplace Injuries

When it comes to workplace injuries, in many cases, filing a workers’ compensation insurance claim should be your first course of action. However, you might also be eligible for a personal injury claim, especially if a third party (for example, an equipment or product manufacturer) contributed to your accident. Consider consulting with a personal injury attorney if you need assistance filing a workers’ compensation claim, if a third party was involved in your injury, or if you have been denied a claim, wrongfully terminated, or retaliated against after filing a claim.

Dog Bites

Laws and ordinances covering when an owner can be held liable if their dog attacks someone vary by state. Personal injury attorneys in Oregon are familiar with dog bite laws, which follow a mixed-liability model, where a dog owner is held liable if they knew or should have known about their dog’s dangerous behavior.

In dog bite cases, a personal injury attorney will investigate the dog’s history and whether there were prior incidents of aggression. They’ll also try to establish whether the dog owner failed to use reasonable care to prevent the attack.

Wrongful Death

Sometimes, surviving family members may choose to pursue a personal injury case on behalf of a loved one who has died as a result of negligence or another party’s intentional actions. Most often, these types of wrongful death cases arise from car accidents, medical malpractice, workplace accidents, or defective products. Personal injury attorneys can help identify the responsible parties, establish negligence or liability, and pursue financial compensation to cover funeral expenses, pain and suffering, loss of wages, and so on.

Need Personal Injury Attorneys in Oregon?

If you would like an ally as you navigate life after experiencing a traumatic injury or other damages due to the actions or negligence of another party, consulting with legal experts who specialize in personal injury cases is an important step. Keep in mind that the statute of limitations in Oregon to pursue legal action after personal injury is two years, so the sooner you reach out, the better. Warren Allen LLP’s team of personal injury attorneys have years of experience in evaluating cases, providing legal guidance, communicating with insurance companies and opposing counsel, seeking fair compensation for damages, and compassionately representing our clients’ interests in court. Schedule a free consultation to discuss your case today.

Involved in a Hit and Run in Oregon? What To Do Next

Involved in a Hit and Run in Oregon? What To Do Next

Written by George McCoy on . Posted in Car Accident, Personal Injury.

Being involved in a hit-and-run in Oregon can be a shocking and disorienting experience, leaving drivers feeling stunned, confused, and uncertain about what to do next. The sudden impact, the sound of crunching metal, and the realization that the other party has fled the scene can be traumatic, and it’s not uncommon for drivers to feel overwhelmed and unsure of how to proceed. In the aftermath of a hit-and-run incident, drivers may face a range of challenges, from dealing with insurance companies to seeking medical attention for injuries.

A hit-and-run incident can be complex, involving multiple parties, insurance claims, and potential legal action. Having to interact with law enforcement, insurance adjusters, and medical professionals, all while trying to repair your vehicle and get your life back on track, can be incredibly stressful and frustrating.

This article will provide guidance for drivers who find themselves in the aftermath of a hit-and-run accident in Oregon, outlining the immediate steps to take, the importance of obtaining medical attention, and the options for seeking compensation. Understanding the process can help you make informed decisions and take the necessary steps to protect your rights and interests.

At Warren Allen LLP, we understand the complexities and challenges involved in these cases. We have a deep understanding of the unique nature of Oregon law and are committed to client-centered advocacy and helping hit-and-run victims receive the best possible outcome in their cases.

Immediate Steps After a Hit-and-Run

After a hit-and-run, take immediate action and report the accident. Contact the police and provide as much detail as possible about the incident, including the location, time, and description of the other vehicle. If the other party has fled the scene, reporting the accident to the police can help initiate an investigation and increase the chances of identifying the other driver.

Gathering evidence is another critical part of the process. You should take photos of the scene, including damage to your vehicle or property and visible injuries. You should also make note of any distinctive features of the other vehicle, such as the license plate number or make and model of the vehicle. Witness statements can also help piece together what happened.

Be sure to keep a detailed record of any expenses related to the accident, including medical bills, repair estimates, and a record of any time missed from work. This will help you build a strong case and increase the chance of compensation.

Seeking Medical Attention

After a hit-and-run in Oregon, seek medical attention. Having a thorough medical evaluation can help identify any potential hidden injuries that may not be immediately apparent, like whiplash or internal injuries. A medical evaluation also provides a record of the injuries, which can be important for insurance purposes and in the case of a lawsuit. Some injuries may require ongoing treatment, and a medical professional can also help develop a treatment plan to ensure the best possible outcome.

Seeking prompt medical attention ensures you receive both the necessary treatment and the documentation to support your claim. This can be especially important in hit-and-run cases, where the at-fault driver may not be identified or may not have insurance.

Understanding Your Legal Rights

It’s important to understand the legal rights and options available to victims of a hit-and-run in Oregon, as medical billing and insurance laws can be complex. Oregon law takes hit-and-run incidents seriously, and drivers who flee the scene can face severe penalties, including fines, license suspension, and even imprisonment. The law requires drivers to stop and exchange information after an accident, and failure to do so can result in serious consequences.

It’s also important to be mindful of the statute of limitations for filing a claim in Oregon, as this sets a deadline for filing a lawsuit. If you miss this deadline, you may lose your right to seek compensation. The statute of limitations for personal injury claims in Oregon is generally two years from the date of the accident, but it’s best to consult with an attorney experienced in Oregon law, like those at Warren Allen LLP, to understand the specific requirements for your case.

Insurance Options and Uninsured Motorist Coverage

After a hit-and-run in Oregon, understanding your insurance options is essential to ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve. Oregon law requires drivers to carry personal injury protection (PIP) coverage and uninsured motorist coverage. Uninsured motorist coverage can help cover expenses related to medical bills, lost wages, and property damage when the at-fault driver is not identified or does not have insurance.

Insurance adjusters may ask questions about the incident, and it’s important to provide accurate and detailed information. You should also review your policy to understand the coverage limits or any exclusions that may apply. It’s also a good idea to keep a record of all correspondence with your insurance company, including phone calls, emails, and letters.

Pursuing Compensation

In a hit-and-run case, victims may be eligible for compensation for various types of damages, including economic damages, such as medical expenses and lost wages, and non-economic damages, like pain and suffering and emotional distress. In some cases, punitive damages may also be available, which can be awarded to punish the at-fault driver for their reckless or intentional behavior. Seeking legal representation is imperative in the aftermath of a hit-and-run in Oregon. An experienced attorney will advocate on the victim’s behalf, ensuring their rights are protected and that they receive the compensation they deserve. Warren Allen LLP is a trusted resource for those seeking legal guidance and representation and can help victims of hit-and-run incidents achieve the best possible outcome. Contact us so you can move forward with your life.

Is Hiring a Personal Injury Attorney in Portland Worth It?

Is Hiring a Personal Injury Attorney in Portland Worth It?

Written by George McCoy on . Posted in Personal Injury.

Personal injury cases can stem from a wide range of incidents, including car accidents, slip and fall accidents, medical malpractice, and product liability. In Portland, if you’ve suffered injuries due to the negligence or recklessness of others, you may be able to seek compensation for damages. Due to the unique nature of Oregon’s laws, hiring a personal injury attorney in Portland can make all the difference, providing you with the expertise and support you need to pursue justice and secure fair compensation.

Physical pain, emotional distress, and financial hardships are just a few of the consequences caused by personal injury, varying in severity and duration. In addition to coping with the immediate aftermath of an injury, ongoing medical expenses, lost wages, and reduced quality of life are also common challenges you may face after an injury has occurred. Seeking compensation through a personal injury claim can help you recover your losses and rebuild your life, but the process can be complex and intimidating, especially for those who are unfamiliar with the law.

Hiring a skilled and experienced personal injury attorney in Portland provides you with the expert representation you’ll need, guiding you through the intricacies of the legal system and ultimately securing the compensation you deserve. Your attorney will handle all aspects of your claim, from gathering evidence to negotiating with insurance companies to representing you in court. This takes a significant burden off you so you can focus on your recovery.

The attorneys at Warren Allen LLP have extensive experience in handling personal injury cases and a proven track record of securing successful outcomes for our clients. In this article, we lay out why hiring a personal injury attorney for your Portland case is always worth consideration.

Understanding Personal Injury Law

Personal injury law is a complex and multifaceted field that encompasses a wide range of concepts, principles, and regulations. It’s important to have a clear understanding of your rights and options under personal injury law, and this is where hiring a personal injury attorney in Portland can be incredibly beneficial.

A personal injury attorney will help you understand key concepts such as negligence, liability, and damages. Negligence refers to the failure of an individual or entity to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. Liability refers to the legal responsibility of an individual or entity for causing harm to another person. Damages refer to the compensation awarded to an individual for their injuries and losses.

In addition to understanding these key concepts, you should also be aware of the various types of compensation that may be available, including economic damages, non-economic damages, and punitive damages. Economic damages refer to the financial losses incurred because of an injury, such as medical expenses and lost wages. Non-economic damages refer to the non-financial losses due to an injury, such as pain and suffering, and emotional distress. Punitive damages refer to the compensation awarded to an individual as punishment for the negligent or reckless behavior of the person liable.

Working with a personal injury attorney in Portland allows you to gain a deeper understanding of these complex concepts and ensure your rights are protected throughout the legal process.

Building a Strong Case

Gathering and analyzing evidence is a fundamental aspect of building a strong case. Witness statements provide valuable insights into the circumstances surrounding the injury, while medical records help establish the extent of the injuries and the necessary treatment. Expert testimony can offer specialized knowledge and opinions that help support your case.

In addition to collecting evidence, your attorney will also help you preserve your evidence, ensuring that it remains intact and admissible in court. This could involve storing physical evidence, such as photographs or videos, in a secure location or ensuring that digital evidence, such as emails or text messages, is properly documented and retained.

By working with a personal injury attorney in Portland, you can ensure your case is built on a solid foundation of evidence. The attorneys at Warren Allen LLP will present your case and advocate on your behalf to secure fair compensation for your injuries and losses.

Dealing with Insurance Companies

Dealing with insurance companies can be a daunting task, especially for individuals who are already struggling with the aftermath of a personal injury. Insurance companies have teams of adjusters and lawyers who will try to minimize payouts and protect the company’s interests. Hiring a personal injury attorney in Portland can be a game-changer in these situations, providing you with the expertise and support you need to negotiate with insurance companies and secure fair compensation by advocating on your behalf and pushing back against low settlement offers.

Insurance companies often use tactics like delaying payments, making low settlement offers, and disputing the severity of injuries to minimize payouts. For example, insurance companies may try to dispute the severity of your injuries by arguing they are not as serious as claimed. Your attorney will counter these tactics with medical evidence, such as doctor’s reports, medical records, and expert testimony, to establish the severity of your injuries.

Benefits of Aggressive Representation

In personal injury cases, you need an attorney who will assert your rights and interests by taking a proactive approach to your case. Aggressive representation sends a clear message to insurance companies and defendants that you will not settle for less than you deserve, making them more likely to settle your claim quickly and fairly to avoid the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Hiring a personal injury attorney in Portland is not just about securing compensation but also about holding negligent parties accountable for their actions. The experienced attorneys at Warren Allen LLP are committed to providing exceptional representation for those seeking compensation after a personal injury and delivering personalized support and aggressive advocacy for every client.

Personal Injury Settlement vs. Going to Trial: Is One Better?

Personal Injury Settlement vs. Going to Trial: Is One Better?

Written by George McCoy on . Posted in Personal Injury.

If you’ve suffered an injury from an accident caused by someone else’s negligence, you may be entitled to compensation for financial and emotional damages. Even though it can be a trying time while you recover from your injury, it’s important to file your claim as soon as possible so you can receive the money you may be owed. However, do not feel pressured to rush for a personal injury settlement without weighing all your options.

Should you resolve your personal injury case through a settlement or court trial? Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, so it’s important to examine each course of action as it relates to your particular claim. Ultimately, you should choose the route that maximizes the compensation you are entitled to without compromising your own comfort level in the process. What is most important to you? A higher reward? Faster resolution? Lower fees? Choose the route you are comfortable with that can best achieve your desired outcome.

At Warren Allen LLP, we understand it can be difficult to make the best decision in the aftermath of an accident. That is why our team of experts is ready to advise you every step of the way. Our firm is dedicated to representing your best interests so you can receive fair compensation and the best resolution possible.

Personal Injury Settlement vs. Going to Trial

Before we examine the pros and cons of opting for a settlement or going to trial, it’s important to first understand the difference between these two viable options.

A personal injury settlement is a formal agreement between the injured party and the at-fault party for an agreed-upon sum of money in lieu of going to court. The injured party drops their legal claim in exchange for financial compensation from the at-fault party. The injured party can receive compensation for financial and emotional damages, including, but not limited to, medical bills, lost wages, property damage, and pain and suffering.

This can happen anytime throughout the litigation process. The plaintiff’s lawyer sends a demand letter to the defendant’s lawyer detailing the amount of damages being sought and the documents justifying these demands. Both parties work toward an agreement through negotiations.

If your personal injury case goes to trial, both the injured and at-fault party present their claims before a judge or jury. Each side of the case is presented through testimonies and physical evidence. After opening statements, cross-examinations, and closing statements, the jury or judge reaches a verdict. Finally, a ruling is issued based on this verdict.

Now that you understand the basic differences between a personal injury settlement and going to trial, which one is better?

Pros and Cons of a Personal Injury Settlement​

When you decide to settle out of court, you can benefit from a faster resolution so you can receive your compensation sooner. This can save you the hassle of lengthy, drawn-out proceedings that may delay payment and generate more stress. An attorney may advise settling to save you the emotional stress of reliving a painful memory in a public court. When you settle, you can ensure your own privacy with a speedier resolution, recoup losses faster, and focus on what matters most: healing.

When you settle, you are not giving up control to an uncertain outcome determined by a judge or jury. You have the power to negotiate the terms and compensation amount, providing more certainty and less risk. You are guaranteed compensation and can negotiate a favorable outcome. You can also avoid costly court fees.

Keep in mind, however, there is potential for lower compensation. To avoid going to trial, the injured party may need to accept a lower amount. While the amount may be less than the result of winning a trial, it is guaranteed. If your case goes to trial, you risk walking away empty-handed. On the other hand, a lower settlement may not fully cover your damages, and all settlements are final. You cannot renegotiate if your injuries worsen.

Pros:

  • Faster resolution
  • Less risk with certain outcomes and guaranteed compensation
  • Lower costs in legal fees, court costs, and lost time at work
  • Confidentiality

Cons:

  • Potential for lower compensation
  • No guarantee of fairness
  • No renegotiations
  • No public accountability

If you believe the settlement amount is unfair, you could benefit from going to trial.

Pros and Cons of Going to Trial

Insurance companies often attempt to minimize the amount you receive for your personal injury settlement. If you take your claim to trial, an impartial judge or jury determines the outcome. If you have a strong case with clear evidence pointing toward negligence, you may be awarded significantly higher compensation. You may also be awarded additional compensation for pain and suffering.

Court trials can also provide justice for the injured party. The at-fault party is not only deemed liable but found “guilty.” There is now a public record of their negligence, and it may deter repeat offenses. Going to trial can provide accountability for the negligent party and transparency for the victim and the public. It can also set a precedent for similar cases in the future, possibly preventing further wrongdoing.

Though there may be greater potential for higher compensation, it’s not guaranteed. You can walk away with more, less, or nothing at all. Trials are not only unpredictable but also expensive. This can add financial stress on top of the emotional stress of going to trial. Be prepared for the trial to take up to a year or more to get started after the demand is initially filed.

Pros:

  • Potential for higher compensation
  • Potential for a fair outcome and justice for the injured party
  • Public record creates accountability and transparency

Cons:

  • More expensive than settling
  • Can be stressful for everyone involved
  • More risk with unpredictable outcomes
  • Lengthy process from pre-trial discovery and depositions to the trial itself and possible appeals
  • Lack of privacy with public records

The Bottom Line

Each case is different. Your legal expert at Warren Allen LLP will help you decide when you can benefit from settling or when it is advantageous to go to trial. Contact us today to receive sound legal advice and learn what your options are. Your personal injury attorney will protect your best interests, whether that’s settling out of court or in.

What Does Loss of Enjoyment of Life Mean in Personal Injury Terms?

What Does Loss of Enjoyment of Life Mean in Personal Injury Terms?

Written by George McCoy on . Posted in Personal Injury.

You’ve suffered an injury due to someone else’s negligence and you’re left wondering, what’s next? Perhaps their wrongdoing has had a profound impact on your quality of life. Maybe you’ve had to take time off from work to receive treatment and recover. Medical bills and other expenses are piling up while you’re trying to focus on what matters most, healing. Maybe the injury you sustained from the other party’s negligence has left you in chronic pain and you can no longer do the things you once enjoyed. If so, you may be entitled to compensation for both economic and emotional damages.

Though it’s easier to calculate lost wages, medical bills, and damaged property, it’s not the only thing that counts as compensable damage. Your quality of life matters. If you have experienced “loss of enjoyment of life,” a legal concept we will unpack in this article, you may be entitled to additional compensation. How is non-economic loss evaluated and does your particular case qualify? Keep reading to understand how this process works and whether the impact you’ve suffered from your personal injury may entitle you to compensation.

What Is Loss of Enjoyment of Life?

Injuries can alter your life in such a way that they diminish your previous quality of life. Before your accident, you may have had a robust lifestyle filled with social engagements, hobbies, sports, travel, and other activities that brought you joy. Daily chores such as cooking and cleaning might have been done with ease. Now, you may struggle to keep up with day-to-day chores that are necessary to sustain daily living. On top of that, it may not be possible to participate in your hobbies or engage in activities that previously filled you with purpose and joy. This diminished quality of life may be compensable.

Loss of enjoyment of life is a legal term that refers to non-economic damage that may be claimed as part of a personal injury case. To claim these damages, you need to be able to prove that your injury has had a direct impact on your quality of life, limiting or preventing you from participating in the activities you once enjoyed.

Since diminished quality of life can be subjective, insurance companies may try to minimize the compensation you receive and not offer a fair amount for your losses. Avoid losing out on what you may be owed by partnering with a personal injury attorney. Experts in personal injury law can fight for your best interests and help you find the best resolution possible.

What Circumstances Qualify as Loss of Enjoyment of Life?

Loss of enjoyment of life refers to injuries sustained from an accident that impede your ability to participate in activities you previously enjoyed.

Some examples of qualifying circumstances include, but are not limited to:

  • You are no longer able to participate in your favorite physical activities due to extensive injuries from your accident. Limited mobility, loss of limbs, or paralyzation may keep you from participating in your favorite sports or hobbies such as hiking, running, rock climbing, playing basketball, or other physical activities.
  • A traumatic brain injury may affect your cognitive ability to focus on activities you enjoy such as reading, writing, playing music, pursuing intellectual studies, and other hobbies requiring attention.
  • You are unable to hold or play with your children or take care of pets.
  • You no longer have the ability to travel or pursue recreational activities with friends and family.
  • You’re unable to participate in social engagements and loss of social opportunities.
  • Your injuries lead to chronic pain.
  • Your injuries limit your ability to be sexually intimate with your partner.
  • You are unable to complete daily tasks such as cooking, cleaning, laundry, sleeping, driving, and so forth.

If you are uncertain if your exact experience qualifies as a loss of enjoyment of life or have questions regarding your eligibility for compensation, it may be wise to seek legal counsel. Our team of legal experts at Warren Allen LLP is ready to answer your questions and offer legal advice you can count on. We will review your case and help you receive the compensation you are entitled to.

How Is Loss of Enjoyment of Life Calculated?

Economic damages may initially seem easier to quantify and clearer cut than non-economic losses. Since finances deal with numbers, you can look at receipts and paystubs to calculate how much money you lost due to medical bills, property damage, or lost wages from missing work. Conversely, you cannot put a number on losing intimacy with your partner or experiencing depression from missing out on your favorite social activities and hobbies. Without the guidance of numeric value, how is non-economic loss evaluated?

Two of the more common methods insurance companies use to calculate non-economic loss are the multiplier and per diem methods.

The multiplier method uses the value of economic damages and multiplies it by a number assigned based on a variety of factors, such as the severity of the injury, the age of the injured party, and future repercussions from the injury. The multiplier is assigned a number typically between 1 and 5. If an injury is catastrophic, resulting in severe physical trauma, the multiplier may be awarded a number higher than 5. An example calculation of this method might be: If the injured party has a total of $50,000 in economic damages and is assigned a multiplier of 3, then they can be entitled to $150,000 for their loss of enjoyment of life.

The per diem method assigns a value for the loss of enjoyment of life per day, and the injured party is paid for each day they suffered from their injury. This method is suitable for temporary damages in which the plaintiff is expected to make a full recovery and not for accidents causing lasting pain or permanent injury.

Final Considerations

Your personal injury attorney will evaluate your damages and ascribe a potential dollar value to your non-economic losses. Using cases with similarities, they will determine which dollar amount is considered fair and negotiate on your behalf with the insurance company. Though they cannot guarantee any amount, they can help you receive fair compensation and the best resolution possible.

In many cases, loss of enjoyment of life can have a profound impact on claim resolution, resulting in increased settlement amounts or court awards—the amount of money ordered by the court in a lawsuit to be paid to the injured party.

Navigating the complexities of loss of enjoyment of life may prove difficult without the help of a skilled attorney. Consider enlisting the help of a legal firm experienced in personal injury claims. They can help you submit a strong claim with the necessary evidence so you can receive what you are entitled to. For the best possible outcome, contact Warren Allen today to learn what your options are. We’ll do the hard work for you, so you can focus on what matters most: getting better.

How To Define Duty of Care: Understanding Its Role in Medical Malpractice

How To Define Duty of Care: Understanding Its Role in Medical Malpractice

Written by George McCoy on . Posted in Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury.

To define duty of care means recognizing the responsibility healthcare providers have to deliver treatment that meets established standards, ensuring patient safety and well-being. It empowers patients and engenders trust in the healthcare system. It is also where legal and ethical considerations can come into play in medicine.

Duty of care is a key principle in cases involving medical malpractice. Failure to fulfill it can have disastrous results. Physical harm, emotional trauma, and even death are all possible consequences of such negligence. Beyond individual tragedies, these failures shake the foundation of trust in the greater healthcare system by destroying the critical bond that must exist between patients and providers.

The concept of duty of care fosters a philosophy of safety, transparency, and accountability in health systems. At Warren Allen LLP, we advocate on behalf of patient rights and the accountability of healthcare providers.

Understanding Duty of Care in Healthcare

Legal principles define duty of care in accordance with accepted standards of medical care. This encompasses diagnosis, treatment, and appropriately educating the patient. The core of duty of care is that a medical professional must act with the competence expected from their role in similar circumstances.

For instance, a physician has to diagnose a condition correctly and offer effective treatment; a nurse has to administer the correct medication and properly monitor the patient’s vital signs. Care providers are also obligated to educate patients regarding their illnesses, options for treatment, and how to take proper care of themselves. With these responsibilities, duty of care ensures medical professionals prioritize the patient’s best interests and the prevention of harm.

It is worth noting that care providers must temper their legal obligations with consideration and sensitivity to the patient, as well as respecting their wishes. This balance is imperative in developing a healthcare environment that will focus not just on accountability but also on humane, person-centered care.

Establishing Liability in Medical Malpractice Cases

It is necessary to define duty of care in each case, as it plays a large part in the determination of liability regarding medical negligence. The following four elements need to be proven for establishing liability:

  1. Duty—that the healthcare provider is obliged to meet the standard of care
  2. Breach—failure on the part of the healthcare provider to fulfill the obligation
  3. Causation—links breach to the harm the patient has suffered
  4. Damages—the injury or loss that results due to a breach

The standard of care serves as the rule by which a provider’s conduct is judged. It is the threshold of the degree of skill, knowledge, and competence that should be exercised by a reasonably prudent healthcare professional under specific circumstances. For example, in the case of an undiagnosed serious condition, the court must decide whether the physician acted without regard to the standard of care. If it is established that a lapse has occurred and that it was the direct cause of injury or harm, the provider may be liable.

By defining duty of care and evaluating cases against this standard, courts can ensure patients receive justice for any harm caused. This process underscores the importance of maintaining professional standards across the healthcare industry.

The Impact of Duty of Care on Patient Safety

The principle of duty of care is central to patient safety and minimizing the risk of errors, misdiagnoses, and poor outcomes. When healthcare providers practice this duty, they demonstrate a commitment to the delivery of care that places the interest of their patients at the forefront. This means being up-to-date with medical knowledge, acting according to best practices, and promoting a culture of candor and accountability in their organizations.

Duty of care has a ripple effect that extends beyond the individual patient. Consistently meeting one’s obligations as a provider fosters a healthcare system in which patients can feel confident and trusting. Conversely, a breach of duty of care could have far-reaching implications, eroding public trust and undermining the integrity of the healthcare system.

Examples of Breaches of Duty of Care

Breaches of duty of care can come in many forms in healthcare and usually have disastrous results. The most common ones include misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis, which might result in the aggravation of the condition or even death. Other serious violations of this duty include performing the wrong surgery or operating on the wrong patient.

Another critical area where breaches occur is in informed consent. Patients have the right to be informed about the risks, benefits, and alternative options to a proposed treatment. Without such information, they cannot make an informed decision regarding their care, and this could cause them harm or lead to ethical violations. Similarly, poor post-operative care or failure to follow up with treatment can result in complications or prolonged recovery, which further illustrates the devastating effects of breaching one’s duty of care.

The Broader Implications of Duty of Care

When breaches happen, addressing them is important in maintaining the integrity of the healthcare system. This includes accountability of providers for their actions, learning from mistakes, and taking measures to prevent future incidents.

To define the duty of care in medicine, in essence, means to define the expected standard of care. This standard is the foundation of patient trust in the healthcare system. By appreciating its importance and the role it plays in medical malpractice cases, we can also appreciate the critical balance that exists between legal accountability and compassionate caregiving. Upholding this principle ensures that the patients receive the high quality of care they deserve while promoting transparency and continuous improvement within the healthcare system. For those who have been impacted by medical malpractice, seeking justice is an important first step toward healing. At Warren Allen LLP, we are committed to representing those who have suffered due to breaches of duty of care, ensuring that their voices are heard and their rights protected.

Top 5 Mistakes to Avoid When Litigating Dog Bite Cases in Oregon

Top 5 Mistakes to Avoid When Litigating Dog Bite Cases in Oregon

Written by George McCoy on . Posted in Personal Injury.

Litigating dog bite cases in Oregon requires expertise. There is a multi-tiered set of laws and regulations regarding dog ownership and liability in Oregon, and skilled legal guidance is required to secure fair compensation for victims. With several reported cases of dog bites in Oregon each year, the injuries sustained and the psychological trauma thereafter can be extremely difficult to deal with. Effective litigation ensures victims get justice with rightful compensation.

A strong understanding of Oregon’s unique personal injury laws is a necessity for successful litigation. This includes familiarization with state-specific statutes.

A good litigation strategy incorporates various factors, including medical expenses, lost wages, emotional distress, and long-term consequences. The development of a solid case also depends on careful preparation and a variety of evidence.

Knowing the potential pitfalls of litigating dog bite cases in Oregon is particularly helpful to both plaintiffs and attorneys, and avoiding these issues is vital to a successful outcome case.

Common Litigation Mistakes

1. Missing Deadlines

Submitting all time-sensitive documentation when it’s due is imperative to a successful case. This starts with meeting Oregon’s statute of limitations filing deadline. Plaintiffs have two years from the incident date to initiate lawsuits; afterward, their claim is barred. As other requirements arise, it’s important to ensure all paperwork is filed in a timely manner.

2. Insufficient Evidence

Effective litigation requires careful preparation and strategic presentation of evidence. Insufficient evidence can significantly undermine your case. Medical records, witness statements, and photographic documentation are necessary to establish both damage and liability. Attorneys must meticulously collect and preserve this evidence, ensuring accuracy and authenticity.

Understanding Oregon’s law of strict liability and presenting expert testimony will help plaintiffs make complete arguments. Defenses are defeated through detailed argumentation and compelling evidence presentation.

3. Inability to Prove Negligence

Lack of proof of negligence can be another significant challenge—not to be confused with “insufficient evidence.” The plaintiff must be able to prove the owner’s-dog owner’s breach of duty—that is, their carelessness—through elements of knowledge regarding aggressive behavior or failure to restrain the dog.

First, the plaintiff needs to prove that the owner of the dog knew of the dog’s aggressive behavior, such as from prior bites, growling, or snapping incidents. Supporting witness statements and documentation by animal control or law enforcement will enhance cases.

The second element of a breach of duty consists of proving the failure of the dog owner to restrain or warn others about imminent dangers. Standard care requirements may be detailed by expert veterinarians or animal behaviorists. Experts can attest to concerns regarding genetics, training, or environmental factors that may contribute to aggression. This can help define the responsibility of the owner.

Defendants may rely on assumptions of risk or comparative negligence on the part of the victim, so the plaintiff must also prove they were reasonably cautious and not negligent on their own part.

4. Poor Documentation

The importance of properly documenting injuries and damages cannot be overstated. Precise records of medical treatment, scarring, and emotional distress are necessary to secure compensation. Attorneys and clients need to work closely together to compile comprehensive documentation, including complete and accurate records of the extent of injuries, treatment, procedures, and medical diagnoses. The claimant should keep files with any additional information, including doctor’s notes, medication records, and hospital bills.

Photographing injuries and possible scars can visually show the harm one has experienced. Dates, times, and descriptions should accompany each photo for a clear timeline of healing and possible permanent damage.

Witness statements and testimony provide strong corroboration. Statements from onlookers, family members, or treating physicians provide verification of the victim’s version and establish fault.

Economic damages include actual medical costs and lost earnings. A plaintiff can document financial burdens by collecting invoices, receipts, and payroll records. Non-economic damages are compensation for pain, suffering, and emotional distress. Such subjective experiences are quantified with testimony provided by mental health professionals, loved ones, and victims themselves.

Successfully litigating dog bite cases in Oregon demands meticulous documentation. Working with experienced attorneys, such as the team at Warren Allen LLP, can help ensure nothing is missed.

5. Not Understanding Oregon’s Legal System

Litigation of dog bite cases in Oregon requires familiarity with specific state statutes as they relate to dog bites and pet ownership. Oregon Revised Statute 30.895, for example, holds owners of dogs strictly liable for their pet’s injuries. Oregon’s dog bite statute prioritizes victim protection. Courts consider factors like dog ownership history, training, and prior incidents when determining liability.

Local ordinances and regulations complement state laws, further putting additional responsibilities on dog owners. For instance, Portland requires licensing and vaccination of dogs. These ordinances add depth to litigation.

Reporting requirements are especially important. The Oregon Health Authority requires dog bites to be reported to local health authorities within 24 hours of injury. This helps ensure correct documentation and encourages investigation.

Insurance companies need to be handled strategically. Most may try to minimize their payments or even deny liability. Experienced lawyers will negotiate with them to help clients receive compensation.

Tips for Successful Litigation

Litigating dog bite cases in Oregon requires strategy and skillful execution. Early investigation and evidence collection significantly strengthen cases. Promptly gathering medical records, witness statements, and photographic documentation ensures accuracy and preserves crucial details.

Effective communication with clients and courts fosters trust and clarity. Attorneys should maintain open dialogue, ensure clients understand legal proceedings, and present compelling arguments in court.Experienced counsel can prove invaluable when litigating dog bite cases in Oregon. At Warren Allen LLP, attorneys offer personalized, compassionate representation to help each client receive tailored guidance and advocacy. By prioritizing expert representation and personalized attention, victims can confidently pursue the justice they deserve.

The Benefits of Hiring Local Personal Injury Attorneys

The Benefits of Hiring Local Personal Injury Attorneys

Written by George McCoy on . Posted in Personal Injury.

If you’ve experienced a personal injury, the aftermath can feel overwhelming. You have already suffered the consequences of someone else’s negligence, and now you must file insurance claims, go through medical treatments, manage bills, deal with possible income loss, handle the legal aspects, and more. Many victims believe they have to navigate these tasks on their own, but rest assured that isn’t the case. There are many benefits to hiring local personal injury attorneys and utilizing their legal expertise.

As you research attorneys to represent you and your case, you may be trying to decide between hiring a local attorney or bringing in an outside attorney. Is one option better than the other? In general, working with local personal injury attorneys enhances case outcomes and streamlines the legal process. Read on to learn about the advantages of hiring a local personal injury attorney to help with your case.

In-depth Knowledge of Local Dynamics

One of the biggest benefits of hiring a local personal injury attorney is that they have in-depth knowledge and experience working with regional laws, court systems, and community dynamics. Because they serve in a particular community, local attorneys are adept at navigating the local courts. They have experience with regional judges and other local attorneys and are familiar with filing requirements, local statutes, and more.

Having an attorney who knows their way around the system can streamline procedures and help ensure your case is handled with the utmost care. The combination of experience and local knowledge could give you a leg up in your case.

Personalized Service

Seeking restitution in a personal injury case can be stressful in and of itself, but local attorneys and their staff can provide personalized service that eases the burden. For instance, it’s significantly easier to meet with your attorney in person and share information when they’re based nearby.

By taking the time to understand your situation, explain the process, and handle the case details, the right attorney can make your legal experience significantly less strenuous. Building a strong relationship with your attorney is important, and being able to communicate with them directly and grow that interpersonal relationship will help them build your case.

It may be easier to learn more about an attorney’s services and reputation when they’re local. You can simply ask around. A local attorney will have worked with people in your community already, so you can learn more about others’ experiences when deciding which attorney is best for you. You can also ask about attorneys’ success rates in cases similar to yours.

More Flexibility and Quicker Access to Resources

There are a lot of working parts in a personal injury case. Whether gathering resources and evidence, sharing important information, or preparing and filing necessary documents, it’s important to know that you will be able to access the resources you need quickly to help build your case. Hiring local personal injury attorneys can make a huge difference in how effectively your lawsuit is managed.

Local attorneys will have an easier time contacting witnesses and obtaining key evidence in your case. Connections and resources are incredibly important when building and supporting a case, and it is essential that your attorney has access to records, local professionals (more on this in a moment), eyewitness testimonies, and so on as they are needed.

Local representation reduces the need for travel time and expenses as your legal team completes their investigation and attends in-person appearances such as depositions, settlement negotiations, or court dates. It can also lend more flexibility in terms of setting up appointments. Sudden schedule changes, witness and expert availability, and unexpected circumstances can be better accommodated when you work with local attorneys.

Stronger Relationships with Local Experts

Frequently, processing personal injury cases requires bringing in local experts. Professionals such as health care providers, law enforcement members, or safety inspectors may be needed to provide or interpret supporting evidence either in discovery or if the case goes to trial. A local attorney will already have built relationships and rapport with such professionals in your community. They’ll know who to contact to provide reliable and credible testimony on your behalf. These relationships can be crucial in structuring your case.

Why Hire a Local Attorney?

Ultimately, hiring local personal injury attorneys gives you a better chance of getting the end result you deserve and receiving compensation for your injuries. Because local attorneys are already familiar with regional laws and court systems, they have insider knowledge that an attorney from a different area might not, and it can help them navigate the legal system more effectively.

Local attorneys are also able to offer clients more personalized service. Providing advice and support for the client is easier when the legal team is located close by. Evidence collection, witness and expert interviews, and resource gathering are also more easily accomplished by representation that already practices law within the community.

Hiring a local attorney can directly benefit you, the client, as well. Trusting your attorney to handle the details and do the heavy lifting can minimize your stress and time investment and allow you to focus on making a full recovery, rather than navigating the idiosyncrasies of personal injury law. When you’re healing from an injury or trauma, knowing your case is in good, capable hands can bring significant peace of mind. At Warren Allen, we aim to provide exceptional service and legal advice to our Portland community members. If you are looking for an experienced personal injury attorney in Oregon, contact Warren Allen for a consultation. We understand the ins and outs of the Oregon legal system, and we are prepared to help you receive compensation for your accident and the best resolution possible.

Is Emotional Distress a Personal Injury?

Is Emotional Distress a Personal Injury?

Written by George McCoy on . Posted in Personal Injury.

Personal injury is often associated with physical injuries like broken bones, burns, or sprains. Yet injuries can also be psychological. Emotional distress, for example, can have lasting effects on mental health and quality of life. But does emotional distress qualify as a personal injury? In some cases, yes. The law recognizes emotional distress as a legitimate injury when it results from specific incidents or actions by others.

This article explores when emotional distress may qualify as a personal injury, how to prove it, and situations in which compensation may be available.

What Is Emotional Distress in Legal Terms

Emotional distress refers to significant mental suffering caused by a traumatic event, manifesting as anxiety, depression, difficulty sleeping, or symptoms of PTSD. Emotional distress is often seen in cases where someone has been involved in a traumatic accident, has been the target of harassment, or has witnessed a distressing event.

In legal contexts, emotional distress is categorized as “non-economic” damages. While economic damages cover financial losses like medical expenses or lost wages, non-economic damages address intangible harms, like pain, suffering, and the impact on one’s mental health and lifestyle. If you or someone you know is experiencing this type of harm, consulting a legal professional, such as Warren Allen LLC, may help clarify the options for seeking compensation.

Situations Where Emotional Distress May Qualify as a Personal Injury

Emotional distress can be part of a personal injury claim if it is the result of someone else’s actions or negligence. To qualify as a personal injury, emotional distress typically must be severe and documented. Several types of incidents may lead to claims for emotional distress as part of a personal injury case.

Traumatic accidents, like car collisions, workplace accidents, or injuries in public spaces, often lead to emotional harm. When a person endures an accident, the psychological effects may persist long after physical injuries heal. Anxiety, depression, or PTSD can be triggered by the shock and pain associated with serious accidents. Courts may view these symptoms as significant enough to warrant compensation.

Negligence can also lead to claims of emotional distress. For example, if a property owner fails to maintain a safe environment and someone is injured, the injured party may suffer lasting emotional effects. Similarly, medical malpractice can cause lasting trauma when a patient’s trust is breached through careless or harmful treatment.

In cases of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED), the law considers emotional harm to be the primary injury. IIED occurs when one party’s extreme or malicious behavior causes mental harm to another person. Examples can include harassment, verbal abuse, and bullying. These actions, when intentional and severe, may justify a claim for emotional distress.

Proving Emotional Distress in Personal Injury Cases

Emotional distress can be challenging to prove because it doesn’t leave visible evidence. However, courts require proof that the distress is genuine, severe, and directly linked to the injury event. Demonstrating emotional distress involves several key steps.

First, there must be clear evidence connecting the distress to the defendant’s behavior. For example, if an accident resulted from another driver’s negligence, the person seeking compensation would need to show that the driver’s actions directly caused their mental suffering.

The severity of the distress is also essential to a claim. Documentation of symptoms, medical or psychological evaluations, and a diagnosis from a mental health professional can provide evidence that emotional distress is real and substantial. Experts can help establish the impact of the distress, whether it involves insomnia, anxiety, depression, or other symptoms. 

Duration of the emotional suffering can also impact a claim. Distress that disrupts daily life, work, or personal relationships is often taken more seriously by courts. The testimony of friends, family, or colleagues who have observed changes in the victim’s behavior and well-being can add further weight to a claim.

Challenges and Defenses in Emotional Distress Claims

Defendants may contest claims of emotional distress, arguing that the harm is exaggerated or unrelated to the incident. They may argue comparative negligence, suggesting that the claimant contributed to the situation that caused the distress. For example, if an injured party ignored safety warnings, the defendant may argue that the claimant bears some responsibility for the emotional harm they experienced. 

Another defense often used is the “open and obvious” doctrine, in which a property owner argues that the hazard was so visible that any reasonable person would have avoided it. Property owners may also claim that they had no prior knowledge of the hazard, making them not liable. Consulting an experienced attorney, such as those at Warren Allen, can help clients protect their rights when navigating these complex defenses.

Seeking Compensation for Emotional Distress

If a person succeeds in proving emotional distress in a personal injury claim, they may be eligible for various forms of compensation. Non-economic damages are intended to account for mental suffering and the impact on quality of life. Therapy, counseling, or medications used to manage symptoms may also be covered if these treatments are necessary to address the effects of distress. If the emotional distress has had a lasting impact on the person’s ability to work or has led to life changes, damages for lost wages or reduced quality of life may also be awarded.

The process of bringing an emotional distress claim can be challenging due to the subjective nature of mental harm. With the guidance of skilled legal representation, people affected by emotional distress can pursue fair compensation and protect their well-being. Warren Allen, LLC handles various types of personal injury claims, including those involving emotional distress, and provides resources to help people seek justice and financial support.If you or someone you know has experienced emotional distress due to another person’s actions or negligence, consider consulting with a knowledgeable attorney to understand your options. Call our offices today to schedule a consultation and see how we can offer peace of mind, help clarify the details of your case, and give you the confidence to pursue your rights.